What If

Today I was in Staples and was asked if I wanted to donate $1.95 to the Boys and Girls Club for school supplies.  This is a no-brainer for me, I always say yes to these types of check-out fund raising events.  This got me thinking about a couple of things.

1. What is the deal with $1.95?  Seems like an odd number and one where people would hesitate and say, “No Thank You.” I think a better approach, which I have seen, is to ask would they like to donate and have it be an option of $1, $5, and $10 dollars.  $1.00 is an easy yes I would think.

2. What if every store in the country did this?  Just think of how much money could be raised each year.  What if companies matched a percent of that donation, how many more people would donate?

3. What if banks took their ATM fees and donated 50% to charity?  Banks are making 2-3 BILLION a year on ATM fees.  1.5 Billion sure could help a lot of people, pay for a lot of teachers, feed the homeless, etc.

4. What if every company in the country asked you when you started working “Would like us to make a pre-tax donation to a charity each pay check and take it out automatically?” In June, total employment was 141.6 million people.  If everyone donated $1.00 a week / $52.00 a year—that would equal Seven billion three hundred sixty-three million two hundred thousand dollars a year.  We could probably cure a few diseases with that kind of money.  And because it is pre-taxed it would only cost you about 70 cents instead of $1.00.

Seems like some simple solutions to difficult problems. 

posted in: Personal | Comments (3)

Time to switch off and slow down

Good article on the BBC News site about slowing down.

Technology was supposed to make us more efficient, he explained. But our lives are often so driven by interruptions that a recent report on “info-mania” found that the flood of e-mails was such a distraction that it cut workers IQ by 10 points.

posted in: Technology | Comments (0)

Ethics of a Site Redesign Contest

I currently do some consulting for an ex-employer.  The company has been around since 1999, survived the dot com bust (barely) and is currently running very lean.  The site could use a makeover, design, XHTML, CSS, etc.  Budget constraints don?t allow for much in the way of going and hiring consultants to handle the project.  The site caters to college students and college grads.  My thinking is that this would be a good situation to offer a cash award to the person who comes up with the best re-design.  Not only will it provide cash for their effort it can also act as a portfolio piece.

I question if this is the right way to go.  On one side the company is looking for an inexpensive solution but is working a contest angle.  On the other side interns are hired everyday to do dozens of tasks for little to no wages, what is so different about this?

Thoughts?

posted in: Marketing | Comments (7)